HackerTubeHN

interview · HACKER NEWS RECOMMENDATION

Where's the 'Collusion'?

The Real News Network · 2 HN recommenders · 2 recommendation months

YouTube

Recommended by 2 Hacker News commenters across 2 months (2019–2020).

SignalTube analysis

Among 29 other interview videos tagged Media, journalism & propaganda, the mean is 1.8 distinct HN recommenders. This video has 2 distinct HN recommenders, close to that mean. Recommendations span 2 distinct months; the peer average is 1.7 months. This is a data-derived comparison, not a human review or quality rating.

67% of its 3 labeled comments are marked as recommendations or strong recommendations. HN mention years are 2019–2020; those years describe discussion history, not upload date. A verified runtime is not present in the current metadata snapshot. A verified YouTube publication date is not present in the current metadata snapshot.

Channel / speaker
The Real News Network
Verified runtime
Not verified in the current YouTube metadata
YouTube upload date
Not verified
Hacker News mention years
2019–2020

SAME TOPIC AND FORMAT

Compare with related videos

29 peers

The comparison cohort uses other interview videos in Media, journalism & propaganda. “Shared recommenders” counts HN users who recommended both videos in the source graph.

VideoHN recommendersRecommendation monthsPositive label shareShared recommendersRuntimeUpload date
Where's the 'Collusion'?Current video2267%—Not verified in the current YouTube metadataNot verified
Government Surveillance: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)interview · LastWeekTonight5525%No recorded overlapNot verifiedNot verified
Jon Stewart on Crossfireinterview · Alex Felker5525%No recorded overlapNot verifiedNot verified
Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernisminterview · Channel 4 News5536%No recorded overlapNot verifiedNot verified

THREE SOURCE-BASED CONTEXT POINTS

Why Hacker News recommends it

3 mentions

Each note combines the dataset’s stance label and short rationale; comment bodies are not reproduced. Open the HN source for the original discussion.

strong rec2020-09Original HN comment ↗

The archive classifies this as a strong recommendation in “Assange Hearing Day 17”. Its short rationale: the source snapshot has no short rationale for this mention.

The archive classifies this as a recommendation in “Guardian records first operating profit since 1998”. Its short rationale: Interview with the article's author giving context on who he is.

The archive classifies this as a critical mention in “Russiagate is a death-blow for the reputation of the American news media”. Its short rationale: the source snapshot has no short rationale for this mention.