demo · HACKER NEWS RECOMMENDATION
Apollo Launch Abort System Test
oisiaa · 1 HN recommenders · 1 recommendation months
Recommended by 1 Hacker News commenters across 1 months (2015–2023).
SignalTube analysis
Among 20 other demo videos tagged Space exploration & spaceflight, the mean is 0.8 distinct HN recommenders. This video has 1 distinct HN recommenders, about 1.2× that mean. Recommendations span 1 distinct month; the peer average is 0.8 months. This is a data-derived comparison, not a human review or quality rating.
13% of its 8 labeled comments are marked as recommendations or strong recommendations. HN mention years are 2015–2023; those years describe discussion history, not upload date. Its verified runtime is 2 minutes 22 seconds. YouTube lists its publication date as 2010-09-05.
- Channel / speaker
- oisiaa
- Verified runtime
- 2m 22s
- YouTube upload date
- 2010-09-05
- Hacker News mention years
- 2015–2023
SAME TOPIC AND FORMAT
Compare with related videos
The comparison cohort uses other demo videos in Space exploration & spaceflight. “Shared recommenders” counts HN users who recommended both videos in the source graph.
| Video | HN recommenders | Recommendation months | Positive label share | Shared recommenders | Runtime | Upload date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apollo Launch Abort System TestCurrent video | 1 | 1 | 13% | — | 2m 22s | 2010-09-05 |
| Riding the Booster with enhanced sounddemo · Michael Interbartolo | 3 | 3 | 100% | No recorded overlap | 8m 32s | 2012-03-15 |
| First-stage landing | Onboard camerademo · SpaceX | 2 | 2 | 67% | No recorded overlap | 0m 31s | 2016-05-28 |
| Armadillo Aerospace - Mod free flight, engine restart, 4 viewsdemo · Clark Lindsey | 2 | 2 | 67% | No recorded overlap | 1m 15s | 2010-06-07 |
THREE SOURCE-BASED CONTEXT POINTS
Why Hacker News recommends it
Each note combines the dataset’s stance label and short rationale; comment bodies are not reproduced. Open the HN source for the original discussion.
The archive classifies this as a contextual reference in “SpaceX's next Starship flight could test refueling tech”. Its short rationale: Example of a failed test that still validated the design.
The archive classifies this as a contextual reference in “SpaceX's next Starship flight could test refueling tech”. Its short rationale: Saturn escape test where failure still proved the system.
The archive classifies this as a contextual reference in “Boeing has now lost $1.1B on Starliner, with no crew flight in sight”. Its short rationale: Escape tower worked after the test rocket broke apart.