HackerTubeHN

explainer · HACKER NEWS RECOMMENDATION

DR. QUANTUM - DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT

Angel Art · 0 HN recommenders · 0 recommendation months

YouTube

Recommended by 0 Hacker News commenters across 0 months (2016–2022).

SignalTube analysis

Among 33 other explainer videos tagged Quantum physics, the mean is 3.1 distinct HN recommenders. This video has 0 distinct HN recommenders, below that mean. Recommendations span 0 distinct months; the peer average is 2.9 months. This is a data-derived comparison, not a human review or quality rating.

0% of its 3 labeled comments are marked as recommendations or strong recommendations. HN mention years are 2016–2022; those years describe discussion history, not upload date. Its verified runtime is 5 minutes 13 seconds. YouTube lists its publication date as 2010-12-27.

Channel / speaker
Angel Art
Verified runtime
5m 13s
YouTube upload date
2010-12-27
Hacker News mention years
2016–2022

SAME TOPIC AND FORMAT

Compare with related videos

33 peers

The comparison cohort uses other explainer videos in Quantum physics. “Shared recommenders” counts HN users who recommended both videos in the source graph.

VideoHN recommendersRecommendation monthsPositive label shareShared recommendersRuntimeUpload date
DR. QUANTUM - DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENTCurrent video000%—5m 13s2010-12-27
Quantum Entanglement & Spooky Action at a Distanceexplainer · Veritasium9990%No recorded overlap9m 16s2015-01-12
Bell's Theorem: The Quantum Venn Diagram Paradoxexplainer · minutephysics8542%No recorded overlap17m 35s2017-09-13
The more general uncertainty principle, regarding Fourier transformsexplainer · 3Blue1Brown7664%No recorded overlap18m 7s2018-02-25

THREE SOURCE-BASED CONTEXT POINTS

Why Hacker News recommends it

3 mentions

Each note combines the dataset’s stance label and short rationale; comment bodies are not reproduced. Open the HN source for the original discussion.

The archive classifies this as a critical mention in “A wave function does not collapse upon detection?”. Its short rationale: the source snapshot has no short rationale for this mention.

reference2019-10Original HN comment ↗

The archive classifies this as a contextual reference in “Double Slit Experiment No Mystery”. Its short rationale: Goofy layman explanation stressing observation effects on electrons.

The archive classifies this as a joke in “What should we learn from past AI forecasts?”. Its short rationale: the source snapshot has no short rationale for this mention.