HackerTubeHN

lecture · HACKER NEWS RECOMMENDATION

Pricing Design Work & Creativity (The Guide)

The Futur · 1 HN recommenders · 1 recommendation months

YouTube

Recommended by 1 Hacker News commenters across 1 months (2019–2022).

SignalTube analysis

Among 6 other lecture videos tagged Product, marketing & sales, the mean is 2.8 distinct HN recommenders. This video has 1 distinct HN recommenders, below that mean. Recommendations span 1 distinct month; the peer average is 2.5 months. This is a data-derived comparison, not a human review or quality rating.

33% of its 3 labeled comments are marked as recommendations or strong recommendations. HN mention years are 2019–2022; those years describe discussion history, not upload date. Its verified runtime is 36 minutes 30 seconds. YouTube lists its publication date as 2016-10-22.

Channel / speaker
The Futur
Verified runtime
36m 30s
YouTube upload date
2016-10-22
Hacker News mention years
2019–2022

SAME TOPIC AND FORMAT

Compare with related videos

6 peers

The comparison cohort uses other lecture videos in Product, marketing & sales. “Shared recommenders” counts HN users who recommended both videos in the source graph.

VideoHN recommendersRecommendation monthsPositive label shareShared recommendersRuntimeUpload date
Pricing Design Work & Creativity (The Guide)Current video1133%—36m 30s2016-10-22
How to Find Product Market Fit - Stanford CS183F: Startup Schoollecture · Stanford Online4367%No recorded overlap48m 11s2017-05-17
Understanding the Joblecture · Edward Capaldi33100%No recorded overlap4m 56s2016-03-31
Michael Seibel - Building Productlecture · Y Combinator3350%No recorded overlap59m 6s2018-09-05

THREE SOURCE-BASED CONTEXT POINTS

Why Hacker News recommends it

3 mentions

Each note combines the dataset’s stance label and short rationale; comment bodies are not reproduced. Open the HN source for the original discussion.

reference2022-07Original HN comment ↗

The archive classifies this as a contextual reference in “Hertz paid Accenture $32M for a website that never went live (2019)”. Its short rationale: Lecture touching on big corps avoiding cheap vendors.

The archive classifies this as a recommendation in “Ask HN: How much do you pay/charge for a website homepage design?”. Its short rationale: Good talk about pricing design work.

reference2019-04Original HN comment ↗

The archive classifies this as a contextual reference in “Much of the “science” used in design is bullshit (2014)”. Its short rationale: Source for how logo and branding pricing relates to client value and risk.