HackerTubeHN

explainer · HACKER NEWS RECOMMENDATION

The Science of Thinking

Veritasium · 1 HN recommenders · 1 recommendation months

YouTube

Recommended by 1 Hacker News commenters across 1 months (2017–2019).

SignalTube analysis

Among 36 other explainer videos tagged Psychology & human behavior, the mean is 3.3 distinct HN recommenders. This video has 1 distinct HN recommenders, below that mean. Recommendations span 1 distinct month; the peer average is 2.9 months. This is a data-derived comparison, not a human review or quality rating.

25% of its 4 labeled comments are marked as recommendations or strong recommendations. HN mention years are 2017–2019; those years describe discussion history, not upload date. A verified runtime is not present in the current metadata snapshot. A verified YouTube publication date is not present in the current metadata snapshot.

Channel / speaker
Veritasium
Verified runtime
Not verified in the current YouTube metadata
YouTube upload date
Not verified
Hacker News mention years
2017–2019

SAME TOPIC AND FORMAT

Compare with related videos

36 peers

The comparison cohort uses other explainer videos in Psychology & human behavior. “Shared recommenders” counts HN users who recommended both videos in the source graph.

VideoHN recommendersRecommendation monthsPositive label shareShared recommendersRuntimeUpload date
The Science of ThinkingCurrent video1125%—Not verified in the current YouTube metadataNot verified
RSA ANIMATE: Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates usexplainer · Royal Society of Arts111055%No recorded overlapNot verifiedNot verified
The 7 Habits of Highly Miserable Peopleexplainer · CGP Grey11861%No recorded overlapNot verifiedNot verified
Why Being Delusional is a Superpowerexplainer · Veritasium9945%No recorded overlapNot verifiedNot verified

THREE SOURCE-BASED CONTEXT POINTS

Why Hacker News recommends it

4 mentions

Each note combines the dataset’s stance label and short rationale; comment bodies are not reproduced. Open the HN source for the original discussion.

The archive classifies this as a recommendation in “I Was Wrong About Speed Reading (2015)”. Its short rationale: Good summary of Thinking, Fast and Slow idea.

reference2018-07Original HN comment ↗

The archive classifies this as a contextual reference in “Is Facebook a publisher? In public it says no, but in court it says yes”. Its short rationale: the source snapshot has no short rationale for this mention.

reference2017-12Original HN comment ↗

The archive classifies this as a contextual reference in “Call of Duty gaming community points to ‘swatting’ in Wichita police shooting”. Its short rationale: the source snapshot has no short rationale for this mention.