HackerTubeHN

talk · HACKER NEWS RECOMMENDATION

Maybe Not - Rich Hickey

ClojureTV · 14 HN recommenders · 11 recommendation months

YouTube

Recommended by 14 Hacker News commenters across 11 months (2018–2025).

SignalTube analysis

Among 138 other talk videos tagged Programming language design, the mean is 3.1 distinct HN recommenders. This video has 14 distinct HN recommenders, about 4.5× that mean. Recommendations span 11 distinct months, longer than the peer average of 3.1 months. This is a data-derived comparison, not a human review or quality rating.

70% of its 20 labeled comments are marked as recommendations or strong recommendations. HN mention years are 2018–2025; those years describe discussion history, not upload date. A verified runtime is not present in the current metadata snapshot. A verified YouTube publication date is not present in the current metadata snapshot.

Channel / speaker
ClojureTV
Verified runtime
Not verified in the current YouTube metadata
YouTube upload date
Not verified
Hacker News mention years
2018–2025

SAME TOPIC AND FORMAT

Compare with related videos

138 peers

The comparison cohort uses other talk videos in Programming language design. “Shared recommenders” counts HN users who recommended both videos in the source graph.

VideoHN recommendersRecommendation monthsPositive label shareShared recommendersRuntimeUpload date
Maybe Not - Rich HickeyCurrent video141170%—Not verified in the current YouTube metadataNot verified
How Python was Shaped by leaky Internals, Armin Ronacher, Flask frameworktalk · Видео с мероприятий {speach!151690%No recorded overlapNot verifiedNot verified
Why Isn't Functional Programming the Norm? – Richard Feldmantalk · Metosin121270%No recorded overlapNot verifiedNot verified
Growing a Language, by Guy Steeletalk · Bill Pugh111055%No recorded overlapNot verifiedNot verified

THREE SOURCE-BASED CONTEXT POINTS

Why Hacker News recommends it

20 mentions

Each note combines the dataset’s stance label and short rationale; comment bodies are not reproduced. Open the HN source for the original discussion.

reference2025-07Original HN comment ↗

The archive classifies this as a contextual reference in “The jank programming language”. Its short rationale: Hickey talk that criticizes static types.

reference2025-02Original HN comment ↗

The archive classifies this as a contextual reference in “Why Clojure?”. Its short rationale: Hickey's work on type signatures telling little about function behavior.

strong rec2024-11Original HN comment ↗

The archive classifies this as a strong recommendation in “Programming languages that blew my mind (2023)”. Its short rationale: Flipped the commenter's thinking about types and Either.