HackerTubeHN

explainer · HACKER NEWS RECOMMENDATION

World's Roundest Object!

Veritasium · 6 HN recommenders · 4 recommendation months

YouTube

Recommended by 6 Hacker News commenters across 4 months (2013–2018).

SignalTube analysis

Among 8 other explainer videos tagged Physics & space (other), the mean is 3.1 distinct HN recommenders. This video has 6 distinct HN recommenders, about 1.9× that mean. Recommendations span 4 distinct months; the peer average is 2.6 months. This is a data-derived comparison, not a human review or quality rating.

67% of its 9 labeled comments are marked as recommendations or strong recommendations. HN mention years are 2013–2018; those years describe discussion history, not upload date. Its verified runtime is 11 minutes 44 seconds. YouTube lists its publication date as 2013-03-25.

Channel / speaker
Veritasium
Verified runtime
11m 44s
YouTube upload date
2013-03-25
Hacker News mention years
2013–2018

SAME TOPIC AND FORMAT

Compare with related videos

8 peers

The comparison cohort uses other explainer videos in Physics & space (other). “Shared recommenders” counts HN users who recommended both videos in the source graph.

VideoHN recommendersRecommendation monthsPositive label shareShared recommendersRuntimeUpload date
World's Roundest Object!Current video6467%—11m 44s2013-03-25
I promise this story about microwaves is interesting.explainer · Tom Scott9745%No recorded overlap12m 9s2021-05-17
The world depends on a collection of strange items. They're not cheapexplainer · Veritasium6460%No recorded overlap18m 32s2022-11-19
How We're Redefining the kgexplainer · Veritasium33100%No recorded overlap9m 49s2017-07-12

THREE SOURCE-BASED CONTEXT POINTS

Why Hacker News recommends it

9 mentions

Each note combines the dataset’s stance label and short rationale; comment bodies are not reproduced. Open the HN source for the original discussion.

reference2018-11Original HN comment ↗

The archive classifies this as a contextual reference in “International System of Units overhauled in historic vote”. Its short rationale: the source snapshot has no short rationale for this mention.

reference2017-07Original HN comment ↗

The archive classifies this as a contextual reference in “NIST to redefine the kilogram based on a fundamental universal constant”. Its short rationale: the source snapshot has no short rationale for this mention.

The archive classifies this as a recommendation in “Why nuclear energy is our best option at the moment”. Its short rationale: Explains how the gram was defined from water.