SignalTubeHN

explainer · HACKER NEWS RECOMMENDATION

How We Should Vote (Range Voting)

Undefined Behavior · 3 HN recommenders · 2 recommendation months

YouTube

Recommended by 3 Hacker News commenters across 2 months (2017–2019).

SignalTube analysis

Among 33 other explainer videos tagged Probability & game theory, the mean is 2.9 distinct HN recommenders. This video has 3 distinct HN recommenders, close to that mean. Recommendations span 2 distinct months; the peer average is 2.9 months. This is a data-derived comparison, not a human review or quality rating.

25% of its 12 labeled comments are marked as recommendations or strong recommendations. HN mention years are 2017–2019; those years describe discussion history, not upload date. Its verified runtime is 6 minutes 23 seconds. YouTube lists its publication date as 2016-09-10.

Channel / speaker
Undefined Behavior
Verified runtime
6m 23s
YouTube upload date
2016-09-10
Hacker News mention years
2017–2019

SAME TOPIC AND FORMAT

Compare with related videos

33 peers

The comparison cohort uses other explainer videos in Probability & game theory. “Shared recommenders” counts HN users who recommended both videos in the source graph.

VideoHN recommendersRecommendation monthsPositive label shareShared recommendersRuntimeUpload date
How We Should Vote (Range Voting)Current video3225%—6m 23s2016-09-10
Why Your Vote Doesn't Countexplainer · CGP Grey101050%No recorded overlap6m 31s2011-03-09
Once you understand game theory, you understand the world.explainer · Veritasium10859%No recorded overlap27m 19s2023-12-23
Why Being Delusional is a Superpowerexplainer · Veritasium9945%No recorded overlap12m 4s2020-08-28

THREE SOURCE-BASED CONTEXT POINTS

Why Hacker News recommends it

12 mentions

Each note combines the dataset’s stance label and short rationale; comment bodies are not reproduced. Open the HN source for the original discussion.

reference2019-02Original HN comment ↗

The archive classifies this as a contextual reference in “U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize Private Property”. Its short rationale: Explains range voting alongside other systems.

reference2019-02Original HN comment ↗

The archive classifies this as a contextual reference in “A tiny Swiss company thinks it can help stop climate change”. Its short rationale: Alternatives to current voting.

The archive classifies this as a recommendation in “The Second Half of Watergate Was Bigger, Worse, and Forgotten by the Public”. Its short rationale: Relevant to changing how we vote.