explainer · HACKER NEWS RECOMMENDATION
Dance p 3 Mar09
Geoff Cumming · 2 HN recommenders · 2 recommendation months
Recommended by 2 Hacker News commenters across 2 months (2011–2015).
SignalTube analysis
Among 12 other explainer videos tagged Data science & statistics, the mean is 2.7 distinct HN recommenders. This video has 2 distinct HN recommenders, below that mean. Recommendations span 2 distinct months; the peer average is 2.4 months. This is a data-derived comparison, not a human review or quality rating.
67% of its 3 labeled comments are marked as recommendations or strong recommendations. HN mention years are 2011–2015; those years describe discussion history, not upload date. A verified runtime is not present in the current metadata snapshot. A verified YouTube publication date is not present in the current metadata snapshot.
- Channel / speaker
- Geoff Cumming
- Verified runtime
- Not verified in the current YouTube metadata
- YouTube upload date
- Not verified
- Hacker News mention years
- 2011–2015
SAME TOPIC AND FORMAT
Compare with related videos
The comparison cohort uses other explainer videos in Data science & statistics. “Shared recommenders” counts HN users who recommended both videos in the source graph.
| Video | HN recommenders | Recommendation months | Positive label share | Shared recommenders | Runtime | Upload date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dance p 3 Mar09Current video | 2 | 2 | 67% | — | Not verified in the current YouTube metadata | Not verified |
| Is Most Published Research Wrong?explainer · Veritasium | 8 | 8 | 42% | No recorded overlap | Not verified | Not verified |
| You've (Likely) Been Playing The Game Of Life Wrongexplainer · Veritasium | 4 | 3 | 67% | No recorded overlap | Not verified | Not verified |
| Do these scatter plots reveal fraudulent vote-switching in Michigan?explainer · Stand-up Maths | 4 | 2 | 67% | No recorded overlap | Not verified | Not verified |
THREE SOURCE-BASED CONTEXT POINTS
Why Hacker News recommends it
Each note combines the dataset’s stance label and short rationale; comment bodies are not reproduced. Open the HN source for the original discussion.
The archive classifies this as a strong recommendation in “Psychology Journal Bans Significance Testing”. Its short rationale: Dance of the p values demonstration on significance testing.
The archive classifies this as a contextual reference in “Gravity waves from Big Bang detected”. Its short rationale: Shows p-values are a sketchy measure of truth.
The archive classifies this as a strong recommendation in “Ask HN: What interesting non-intuitive things do you know?”. Its short rationale: Visual demonstration of how unstable p-values are across samples.