SignalTubeHN

explainer · HACKER NEWS RECOMMENDATION

Hawking Radiation

PBS Space Time · 3 HN recommenders · 3 recommendation months

YouTube

Recommended by 3 Hacker News commenters across 3 months (2019–2024).

SignalTube analysis

Among 72 other explainer videos tagged Cosmology & astrophysics, the mean is 2.6 distinct HN recommenders. This video has 3 distinct HN recommenders, about 1.2× that mean. Recommendations span 3 distinct months; the peer average is 2.4 months. This is a data-derived comparison, not a human review or quality rating.

60% of its 5 labeled comments are marked as recommendations or strong recommendations. HN mention years are 2019–2024; those years describe discussion history, not upload date. Its verified runtime is 12 minutes 6 seconds. YouTube lists its publication date as 2018-03-15.

Channel / speaker
PBS Space Time
Verified runtime
12m 6s
YouTube upload date
2018-03-15
Hacker News mention years
2019–2024

SAME TOPIC AND FORMAT

Compare with related videos

72 peers

The comparison cohort uses other explainer videos in Cosmology & astrophysics. “Shared recommenders” counts HN users who recommended both videos in the source graph.

VideoHN recommendersRecommendation monthsPositive label shareShared recommendersRuntimeUpload date
Hawking RadiationCurrent video3360%—12m 6s2018-03-15
The Solar Gravitational Lens will Map Exoplanets. Seriously.explainer · Launch Pad Astronomy10965%No recorded overlap23m 32s2020-07-18
A new way to visualize General Relativityexplainer · ScienceClic English8689%No recorded overlap11m 33s2020-09-03
How to Understand What Black Holes Look Likeexplainer · Veritasium8480%No recorded overlap9m 19s2019-04-09

THREE SOURCE-BASED CONTEXT POINTS

Why Hacker News recommends it

5 mentions

Each note combines the dataset’s stance label and short rationale; comment bodies are not reproduced. Open the HN source for the original discussion.

reference2024-08Original HN comment ↗

The archive classifies this as a contextual reference in “Is C99 actually Turing-complete? (2016)”. Its short rationale: Playlist on the holographic universe.

reference2022-05Original HN comment ↗

The archive classifies this as a contextual reference in “Can we make a black hole? And if we could, what could we do with it?”. Its short rationale: Corrects the popular misconception of Hawking radiation.

strong rec2019-08Original HN comment ↗

The archive classifies this as a strong recommendation in “How do black holes destroy information and why is that a problem?”. Its short rationale: Short episodes preparing you to understand Hawking radiation.